FAQ: SRP, the 2026 Election & Ratepayer Issues

Navigating the voting process, and utlility issues at SRP can be very confusing. This FAQ page offers answers to common questions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Get straightforward answers to common questions about SRP, rates, reliability, heat safety, and how the SRP election works. You’ll also find quick context on the 2026 candidates, including Keith Woods for SRP Vice-President, and what a ratepayer-first approach means in real-world decisions.

Growth and large new loads can pressure both the grid and rates if planning isn’t disciplined. The ratepayer-first standard is:

  • Plan resources based on price and reliability, not what’s politically popular
  • Protect existing ratepayers from unintended cost transfers driven by new load growth
  • Avoid premature closures of reliable power assets without proven replacements that can meet peak demand

Use the SRP Voting & Eligibility Information page on the site to get the official steps and deadlines.

Keith Woods is running for SRP Vice-President. His approach is practical: dependable service, disciplined planning, and real oversight so ratepayers aren’t surprised later.

SRP voting eligibility is specific and not the same as a typical political election. The clean, responsible answer is: use the site’s “SRP Voting & Eligibility Information” link and follow the official eligibility rules listed there.

This is a ratepayer-first information site supporting Keith Woods for SRP Vice-President. The focus is simple: affordability, reliability, heat health and safety, and fairness with real transparency.

Because SRP board decisions shape:

  • Whether planning is disciplined or political
  • Long-term power supply costs
  • Reliability investments (maintenance, upgrades, restoration speed)
  • How costs get allocated across customer groups

Reliability means your power stays on when you need it, and if something breaks, it gets fixed fast. In Phoenix summers, “fast” matters because indoor heat can become dangerous quickly.

In Arizona, the system is tested during the hottest hours, not the mild months. If planning is weak for peak demand, it shows up as higher costs, emergency fixes, and higher outage risk.

When bills spike unpredictably, families start making unsafe tradeoffs: running the AC less, delaying repairs, or avoiding cooling during peak heat. Affordability is part of heat safety.

It looks like:

  • Making cost and performance expectations clear upfront
  • Building for peak summer demand, not “average days”
  • Investing in maintenance and upgrades that reduce failures
  • Avoiding rushed decisions that create reliability gaps

Because in extreme heat, electricity is not a “nice to have.” Reliable, affordable power is public safety for families, seniors, renters, and anyone with health risks. Planning mistakes show up when it’s 110°.

It means disciplined, transparent planning so ratepayers get firm power supplies at the best cost available, and so major decisions come with clear answers: what it costs, why it’s needed, and who pays.

It means decisions get judged by outcomes ratepayers feel:

  • Are ratepayers protected from surprise add-ons and cost shifting?
  • Can people afford to cool their homes?
  • Does the grid hold up during peak heat?
  • Are costs justified and explained plainly?

This isn’t a team sport. The position is pro-reliability and pro-affordability. Resource choices should be driven by engineering reality and results for ratepayers. (Physics trumps politics.)

Good default questions:

  • Will this keep the A/C on during the hottest hours?
  • What does it cost, and who pays?
  • What problem does this solve, and how do we measure results?
  • What happens if it’s delayed or costs more than promised?

Transparency means ratepayers get clear answers before major decisions:

  • What problem are we solving?
  • What does it cost?
  • What risk does it reduce?
  • Who pays, and for how long?
  • How will results be measured?
  • “Show the math. Explain it plainly.”

Potentially, but it has to be done responsibly. Some facilities have backup generation and operational flexibility that could support grid emergencies if standards, safety rules, and compensation are clearly defined. The Wall Street Journal reported Jan. 23, 2026 that the U.S. Energy Department directed grid operators to make backup generation from facilities like data centers available during outage emergencies, noting that data-center operators typically don’t distribute energy onto the grid. The practical takeaway: it’s worth exploring, but it must protect reliability and ratepayers, not create new risks.

SRP should be run like critical infrastructure, because in Arizona, heat doesn’t wait. Steve Williams and Keith Woods support disciplined planning, dependable service, and transparent oversight so ratepayers can stay safe during peak heat without getting blindsided by costs.

Can’t Find an Answer?

Call or text us online at 602-938-0442, or email vote@srpexperience.com.